Skip to content

The media’s anthropomorphization of Pluto

June 17, 2007

A quick survey of mainstream media reporting on Pluto this weekend reveals their continued (and incredibly annoying) obsession with turning Pluto into an conscious being with feelings.

Here a few examples. Note red circles (mine).

The San Francisco Chronicle mentions Pluto’s pride. CNN claims the planetary body is suffering from indignity. I guess at least BBC said that Pluto’s status suffered a blow, instead of the dwarf planet itself suffering.


What the hell is the problem? Big deal…we’ve reclassified Pluto. It’s a damn label to help science better communicate. This is how it works. The general public (and apparently science reporters too) can’t seem to grasp the concept of classification. This is a human-made abstraction to help us better understand natural phenomenon. There is no true organization…at least not in this simplified outline form. Classifications are supposed to be refined, changed, tweaked, tanked, overhauled, etc. over time. This is part of doing science!

Maybe you’re saying – ‘relax, they’re just having fun’. I understand that…yeah, sure it’s cute. But if this style of reporting misrepresents how science is done, then I don’t find it so cute.

Besides, if people are really worried about the feelings of a planet (dwarf or otherwise), maybe they should ask Earth.


UPDATE: Add SEED magazine to the list too. Apparently Pluto “…got kicked out of the brotherhood of planets and demoted…”. Sucks to be you Pluto! Oh wait, Pluto is an inanimate body of rock and ice.

Advertisements
4 Comments leave one →
  1. CJR permalink
    June 18, 2007 1:56 am

    My objection is that the new ‘classification’ is just as arbitrary and scientifically uninformative as the old one…

  2. Brian permalink
    June 18, 2007 7:58 am

    yeah, i’m not sure if this classification is the ‘answer’ … but, I think simply the exercise of re-classifying can keep science from getting complacent … the old adage that controversy breeds progress

  3. October 21, 2016 3:09 pm

    I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be
    delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further
    formerly again as exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.

Trackbacks

  1. A year of detritus « Clastic Detritus

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s