Photographic summary of recent Patagonia field work
I am putting together a post about the general geology of the region of southern Chile we work in, what we are working on exactly, etc. but is taking a lot longer than I’d like.
As most of you out there who do relatively long stints of field work you know how it is getting your non-geology life back in order when you get home.
In the meantime, here a some photos and superficial information about them, and anecdotes from this year’s session. (Click on photos for hi-res versions).
The above photo illustrates one reason why we travel so far to look at sedimentary rocks — the exposure. Much of the stratigraphic section we are investigating is shale/siltstone, which does not typically create great outcrops. In this area, however, the recent glaciation has ‘cleaned up’ the mountainsides giving us a glimpse of these strata. You’ll notice in the bottom portion of this exposure an odd lens-shaped area….this section is riddled with deep-sea mass wasting deposits (slumps, slides, debris flow deposits, etc.). The interior of that lens-shaped area is chaotically folded and deformed (syn-sed, soft deformation). There are very few places in the world where this kind of syn-sedimentary deformation is this well-exposed. The photo below is zoomed in a bit. Note the discordant strata in the lower half.
For this particular study area we were lucky to be able to stay in a nice little puesto…a glorified shack where the gauchos stay when they are in the area tending to sheep (see below). Not that I dislike camping…but when working, it is nice to come back to a roof and wood-burning stove in the evening. Plus, being able to drive to the puesto allows us to bring additional supplies (i.e., wine).
Up until this year, all of the work i’ve done in this area has been near, but outside of the national park boundaries (Torres del Paine). A new student is starting a project looking at the structure and thermal/exhumation history of the fold-thrust belt. This requires going further west into the more deformed part of the belt and thus towards the Patagonia ice cap (the 3rd largest continental ice sheet after Antarctica and Greenland, I believe). As you can imagine, accessibility is a major issue….the roads/trails within the park remain the best way to access a lot of these rocks efficiently, safely, and cheaply. So…the bonus is the spectacular scenery. The photo below is from our campsite early one morning…if you’ve ever read anything about this area you’ve no doubt seen this image. It is, by far, the most iconic image of this massif…called Los Cuernos (or ‘horns’).
The light rocks are the granitoid laccolith rocks intruding into the dark shales of the sedimentary sequence we are studying. The sed sequence is Upper Cretaceous…the laccolith is Miocene…I promise I’ll get a post going putting all this random geo-info into some context. By the way, the water in the foreground is essentially sea level and the top of those peaks are nearly 3,000 m (10,000 ft). A little bit of relief.
Another day we were sampling along a trail that led to Glacier Grey. We, of course, had the proper permission and paperwork for sampling in the park, but still got many curious (and some dirty) looks from tourists along the trail. I suppose we may have been ruining their solitude by hammering away….but, hey, tough break. But most people were simply curious and once they find out we are scientists they will ask questions about the area. This photo below is a view of the glacier during our lunch break.
The geologic map of this area that we have is from the late 1970s. Note the two rock ‘islands’ at the glacier front…the bigger one to the right and the much smaller to the left in the photo above. The smaller one is not on the 30 year old map…the glacier has retreated that much.
After this work, me and one other guy set out for an excursion to a rather remote area in an area northeast of the park (again…I will post about the geography/geology more properly sometime soon). I’ve been working in this area for 4 years, but this was the first time to this particular area. It required being horse-packed in and camping for 10 days. Essentially, a gaucho guide takes us in, drops us off, and then comes back on a specific day to retrieve us. I shot this photo (see below) of the gaucho leaving the canyon we were in after dropping us off. He was much more efficient in traveling once he got rid of the two gringos (not necessarily master horseman) and all the supplies.
This was one of the harder areas i’ve worked physically. We couldn’t really get too close to the outcrop we wanted to work on with the horses due the the ruggedness of the canyon we were in. So, we had a 5 km cross-country hike every day to the rocks (about 4 hours). By the end of the excursion we were not only in better shape but had found a good network of game trails that made the commute not so hard on our bodies.
Now that I’m sitting comfortably at home and not cursing my blistered feet and shaking a fist angrily at the weather gods, I can say it was worth it. The sedimentary sequence we were investigating in this area is important to the overall understanding of the basin fill because it is the record of delta progradation that eventually constructs the shelf and fills in the deep-water foreland during the latest Cretaceous. So, in a short sequence we saw turbidites intermingling with hummocky cross-stratification (wave-base) and deltaic deposits. This is another student’s research, so I’m not gonna steal his thunder by posting too much about it….stay tuned.
On a nice day, we got this view from the top of the outcrop (photo above). The tops of those mountains in the distance (to the west) is the Patagonia ice cap…it’s a few km thick in that area…or something like that.
Stay tuned for a post with more geology and context for all of this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Where on (Google)Earth #6?
Back from field work safe and sound
Yet another field season in Patagonia…and i’ve made it out alive and relatively unscathed. Although there’s little to no jet lag involved with the journey from Patagonia to California, it is 24 hours of traveling and if you’re like me and can’t sleep on planes (what a drag!)….it feels about as bad as jet lag.
I will blog more about it and post some photos soon…this weekend I hope. There are a lot of great posts out there in the geoblogosphere that I’d like to catch up on too…and Highly Allochthonous has moved to Scienceblogs…congrats.
Here’s a photo from this year of us on one of the more beautiful days I’ve experienced down there. That’s the torres of Torres del Paine in the background. A lot of tourists travel a long way and never see them because they’ll be shrouded in clouds for days at a time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still in the field
We are in town right now (Puerto Natales, Chile) to resupply, get a shower, and sleep in a bed for a night. There are a bunch of internet cafes in this town because it is a jumping off point for backpackers and such (mostly Europeans) traveling around Patagonia.
The weather has been the usual…either really nice (60s F and sunny) or completely miserable (30s F with snow or rain). I either feel ridiculous carrying so many articles of clothing in my day pack when its nice or wish I had more to wear when its cruddy.
Probably the most exciting thing to happen so far this year…is that I finally saw a puma! They are essentially the same species as a mountain lion in North America but a bit bigger I think. They are around and probably see us all the time, but are timid and difficult to actually see. Today, we saw one cross the dirt road we were driving. I was happy to be in the car…the thing was big and muscular. It could kill and eat me without much trouble if it wanted to. Luckily, they are fairly well fed in this region…plenty of sheep and guanacos (and turistas).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
¿Dónde está …Or Something?
This blog will be dormant for the next month or so while traveling and doing field work in Patagonia. We have sporadic web access in public internet cafes when we are in town re-supplying, but I can’t promise any interesting posts.
In the meantime, check out some of these other geo-related blogs:
Apparent Dip
Highly Allochthonous
Lab Lemming
Southern Exposure
Green Gabbro
¡…Or Something volverá pronto!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2007 AAAS meeting in San Francisco
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is having its annual meeting here in San Francisco.
The “Triple-A-S” meeting is designed for a broader audience than most science meetings. This year’s theme is Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being and also has two days worth of events and demonstrations designed for the general public and whole family:
|
AAAS Family Science Days |
As usual, i’m not quite ready to leave for a long field expedition on Tuesday and have too much crap to do….maybe i’ll try and go tomorrow.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Friday Field Foto #11: Guanaco
I am headed down south again very soon (next Tues) for my last field season in Patagonia…as a student anyway. I’ve had one other post about wildlife we encounter down there.
The above animal is a guanaco, which is sort of like a cross between a llama and a camel. These things are all over the place. We were able to get close to this particular one because we were in Parque Nacional Torres del Paine, where they are tamer. When we see them in other areas outside of the park, they keep their distance. Typically one of them will stand between us and the rest of the herd…keeping the herd informed on what we are doing. Guanacos make a noise that sounds like a horse whinney combined with a laughing hyena.
Whenever we see them, we wish we could ride them up the mountain…they can get up the hills a lot faster than us.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sarcasticity as a function of profile disclosure level
Okay…I have a hypothesis. I’m never gonna test this because compiling the data would be a ridiculous waste of my time.
I’ve noticed a general pattern out there on blogs or forums (places where commenting is allowed) such that the level of snarkiness, rudeness, derisiveness, scorn, disdain, etc. increases as the level of knowledge about the one making the comment decreases. The plot below shows sarcasticity on the y-axis vs. profile disclosure level on the x-axis.

Profile disclosure level of the commenter is discussed here in three basic levels: (1) when the real name and full contact information is either readily available through a link, or not too hard to find, (2) when an alias or nickname is used but enough clues are given that one could likely find out the identity of that person if they really tried, and (3) completely anonymous and without a link to any other site; usually using the name ‘anonymous’ or some other nondescript handle probably never used again.
However, this qualitative relationship has some important caveats:
a) if the commenter and poster know each other reasonably well sarcasticity is more-or-less independent of disclosure level (this is very common)
b) if the commenter is well-known for making rash comments (that’s their bag baby) then they will be more likely to do it regardless
The plot above would require a huge amount of data (hundreds of points) and would likely be a pretty rough trendline. A small sample set, especially taken within one kind of blogging community, would probably not produce this result.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Designed natural cycles…
One of the favorite arguments used by one type of global warming denialist goes something like this:
The Earth has experienced natural and significant climatic swings in the past; therefore the current climatic swing we are experiencing is likely natural (not human-made); therefore we don’t need to take any action.
In this view, they accept the results of paleoclimate studies (the source of knowledge of the natural cycles). This argument is typically trotted out by those who are motivated solely by a economic/political paradigm. That is, they predict that the regulation of emissions will result in global economic recession at best or a complete and total economic catastrophe (i.e., the collapse of modern civilization) at worst.
I’ve always been bothered by the mixing of discussions about scientific conclusions (i.e., the data and conclusions regarding attribution) with discussions regarding policy (i.e., what or what not to do about it). The policy debate is the true and timely discussion to be having at this point. There are legitimate concerns about how to go about mitigating problems that have global reach (and whether or not what we do will even have an impact anyway with all the feedbacks in the system). But, those who have those concerns should discuss them within the context of policymaking. Instead…they bring out the lame since-it-was-natural-in-the-past-it-must-be-natural-now routine. Why not talk about what you really want to talk about?
Anyway…so, then I was thinking about where the intelligent design crowd would fit in here. They can’t possibly believe the flucuations that have been interpreted from paleoclimate proxies (e.g., the last 600,000 years) are an ‘accident’ (i.e., not by design). Do they think the current climatic changes are designed? Does climate even fall into that paradigm? Where is the “boundary” between what gets designed and what is left to evolve naturally?
I’m not sure what my point is.
I haven’t really used this blog as a record of my stream-of-consciousness thoughts….this is probably one of the first ones.
napping = good
I have to admit, it’s nice not trying to produce an actual science post every day. That was a little hectic. Now I can simply link to the latest and greatest until I think of something.
I really hope this info gets out. Napping is not only a great way to spend a half-hour in the middle of the day, not only a way to feel reinvigorated, but apparently napping is good for your health.
So, what’s stopping the United States (just because this is where I live) from adopting a siesta culture? Some would say that it would decrease productivity. I wonder if anyone has done a study trying to model the increase in productivity we might gain by a more refreshed workforce? Not even sure how to go about this.
Anyway… this is an equation I can handle: napping = good
above painting found here
