<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A million years worth of deposition: where and how much?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clasticdetritus.com/2009/02/01/a-million-years-worth-of-deposition-where-and-how-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2009/02/01/a-million-years-worth-of-deposition-where-and-how-much/</link>
	<description>A blog about sedimentary geology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Accretionary Wedge #15: Pondering the geological future of Earth &#171; The Accretionary Wedge</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2009/02/01/a-million-years-worth-of-deposition-where-and-how-much/#comment-5201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Accretionary Wedge #15: Pondering the geological future of Earth &#171; The Accretionary Wedge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.com/?p=1953#comment-5201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Finally, here is my own post that speculates and discusses a million years worth of deposition. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Finally, here is my own post that speculates and discusses a million years worth of deposition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianR</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2009/02/01/a-million-years-worth-of-deposition-where-and-how-much/#comment-5022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.com/?p=1953#comment-5022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SF says: &quot;...could then be buried by as much as a hundred-plus more feet (tens of meters +-) of alluvial debris.&quot;

Great point ... my own bias is in the marine/coastal realm, so I didn&#039;t even look up alluvial rates! I wonder ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SF says: &#8220;&#8230;could then be buried by as much as a hundred-plus more feet (tens of meters +-) of alluvial debris.&#8221;</p>
<p>Great point &#8230; my own bias is in the marine/coastal realm, so I didn&#8217;t even look up alluvial rates! I wonder &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver Fox</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2009/02/01/a-million-years-worth-of-deposition-where-and-how-much/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silver Fox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.com/?p=1953#comment-5020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to have to get the book you&#039;ve recommended here. A million years is a relatively short period of time, geologically speaking; nevertheless, quite a bit can happen during that time. It&#039;s about the minimum time for a hydrothermal ore deposit to form - and it must be plenty of time for one to be buried by sediment, too!

If Basin and Range development continued for another 1 million years, I would think that any ore deposits on pediments that are already under at least a thin alluvial veneer (and so, presently undiscovered), could then be buried by as much as a hundred-plus more feet (tens of meters +-) of alluvial debris. That&#039;s just an extrapolation of your speculations, and it would be complicated by uplift and erosion rates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to get the book you&#8217;ve recommended here. A million years is a relatively short period of time, geologically speaking; nevertheless, quite a bit can happen during that time. It&#8217;s about the minimum time for a hydrothermal ore deposit to form &#8211; and it must be plenty of time for one to be buried by sediment, too!</p>
<p>If Basin and Range development continued for another 1 million years, I would think that any ore deposits on pediments that are already under at least a thin alluvial veneer (and so, presently undiscovered), could then be buried by as much as a hundred-plus more feet (tens of meters +-) of alluvial debris. That&#8217;s just an extrapolation of your speculations, and it would be complicated by uplift and erosion rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Accretionary Wedge #15: Pondering the geological future of Earth &#171; Clastic Detritus</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2009/02/01/a-million-years-worth-of-deposition-where-and-how-much/#comment-5010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Accretionary Wedge #15: Pondering the geological future of Earth &#171; Clastic Detritus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.com/?p=1953#comment-5010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Disclaimers, Commenting, and&#160;Copyright          &#171; A million years worth of deposition: where and how&#160;much? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Disclaimers, Commenting, and&nbsp;Copyright          &laquo; A million years worth of deposition: where and how&nbsp;much? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

