<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science blogger vs. blogging scientist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/</link>
	<description>A blog about sedimentary geology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suji george</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-7740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suji george]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-7740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Categorizing science writing (being subjective) according to me is not a good idea. As in any form of  writing, what is important is the content. A science journalist (TypeI) can write as good article as a hardcore researcher and vice verse is also true. So what matters is the content.

Regards]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Categorizing science writing (being subjective) according to me is not a good idea. As in any form of  writing, what is important is the content. A science journalist (TypeI) can write as good article as a hardcore researcher and vice verse is also true. So what matters is the content.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aletheiazoe</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-6427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aletheiazoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-6427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Type II all the way! Science miscellany and points yet unrelated are my specialty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Type II all the way! Science miscellany and points yet unrelated are my specialty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rationale</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-5235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rationale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-5235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the categories! My blog is definitely a Type II. 
I like classifying things... maybe that&#039;s why I&#039;m in research.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the categories! My blog is definitely a Type II.<br />
I like classifying things&#8230; maybe that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m in research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Brown</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-3939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm...I think I&#039;m definitely a Type II.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biochemicalsoul.com/blog/biochemicalsoul.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Many of my posts&lt;/a&gt; are about science, but somehow, I think half of them end up as rants or essays dealing with science and its relationship to religion or philosophy.

I dig your blog by the way!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;I think I&#8217;m definitely a Type II.  <a href="http://www.biochemicalsoul.com/blog/biochemicalsoul.html" rel="nofollow">Many of my posts</a> are about science, but somehow, I think half of them end up as rants or essays dealing with science and its relationship to religion or philosophy.</p>
<p>I dig your blog by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deciding on a research topic &#171; dilettante</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deciding on a research topic &#171; dilettante]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-3072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Science blogger v. blogging scientist, Classic Detritus blog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Science blogger v. blogging scientist, Classic Detritus blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodSchist.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GeoBlogosphere Review #1</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodSchist.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GeoBlogosphere Review #1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-3024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] dispenses his opinions, splitting science blogger and scientists who blog into groups;  This made me wonder about the constantly-growing group of blogs we tend to group into [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dispenses his opinions, splitting science blogger and scientists who blog into groups;  This made me wonder about the constantly-growing group of blogs we tend to group into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianR</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-3002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hobart says: &quot;...the GSA presenter is geared up to communicate at a higher level.&quot;

Yeah, that&#039;s right. Big conference talks are only 12 minutes or so...if you want to report new data, findings, interpretations you need to skip a lot of context and assume your talking to other experts. And you also end up using a lot of jargon for efficiency. 

For communicating to the general public, jargon usage should be very little or none at all...it can be tough if these words are &quot;common&quot; to you...I try and read and re-read my posts to make sure, but I still use terminology that people probably don&#039;t know all the time.

I like the Arizona Geology site as well...that&#039;s a good one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hobart says: &#8220;&#8230;the GSA presenter is geared up to communicate at a higher level.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s right. Big conference talks are only 12 minutes or so&#8230;if you want to report new data, findings, interpretations you need to skip a lot of context and assume your talking to other experts. And you also end up using a lot of jargon for efficiency. </p>
<p>For communicating to the general public, jargon usage should be very little or none at all&#8230;it can be tough if these words are &#8220;common&#8221; to you&#8230;I try and read and re-read my posts to make sure, but I still use terminology that people probably don&#8217;t know all the time.</p>
<p>I like the Arizona Geology site as well&#8230;that&#8217;s a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobart</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-3000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hobart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 05:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-3000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like those classifications - Type I and Type II.  Reminds me of  a statistics course.

I especially enjoy when people blog about topics in their specialty in language that I can understand.  Most GSA talks that I have attended - even in a topic that might be a specialty of mine - the content generally gets over my head by the second sentence.  Maybe the blogger realizes that anyone could find their way into the blog and the GSA presenter is geared up to communicate at a higher level.

One of my favorites is Lee Allison&#039;s &quot;Arizona Geology&quot; at http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/

There you have a State Geologist talking about the sides of geology that you don&#039;t hear much about in academic or industry circles.  Budgets, politics, bills in the legislature.  These are the things that most geologists give very little thought to but that can have an enormous impact on our profession.  I think that every state geologist should have a blog and that every geologist who does work in that state should read it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like those classifications &#8211; Type I and Type II.  Reminds me of  a statistics course.</p>
<p>I especially enjoy when people blog about topics in their specialty in language that I can understand.  Most GSA talks that I have attended &#8211; even in a topic that might be a specialty of mine &#8211; the content generally gets over my head by the second sentence.  Maybe the blogger realizes that anyone could find their way into the blog and the GSA presenter is geared up to communicate at a higher level.</p>
<p>One of my favorites is Lee Allison&#8217;s &#8220;Arizona Geology&#8221; at <a href="http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>There you have a State Geologist talking about the sides of geology that you don&#8217;t hear much about in academic or industry circles.  Budgets, politics, bills in the legislature.  These are the things that most geologists give very little thought to but that can have an enormous impact on our profession.  I think that every state geologist should have a blog and that every geologist who does work in that state should read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianR</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julian...firstly, you can post comments as long as you want here...go for it!

Secondly, what I think is great about the blog medium is that those who are just getting into the field like yourself can start to interact with a community with such a broad range of experiences and training. We have faculty, students, professionals, and the general public all mingling and talking about stuff. I love it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian&#8230;firstly, you can post comments as long as you want here&#8230;go for it!</p>
<p>Secondly, what I think is great about the blog medium is that those who are just getting into the field like yourself can start to interact with a community with such a broad range of experiences and training. We have faculty, students, professionals, and the general public all mingling and talking about stuff. I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2008/02/05/science-blogger-vs-blogging-scientist/#comment-2989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/?p=560#comment-2989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m honestly not sure which role I&#039;d fit just yet.

I don&#039;t know if I can rightfully call myself any sort of scientist right now, even if I&#039;m taking classes and attending lectures and reading as much as I can find time to read (which isn&#039;t much right now). At this particular point in time, I&#039;m snorkling in the depths that are music comprehensive exams, prose thesis, and composition thesis, all of which feel like huge hurdles before I can hope to get down to more serious science - and I still haven&#039;t received a letter saying either way about my admission to the geophysics program! I&#039;m not sure whether I&#039;m even on base in qualifying what I can call myself based on the degree on which I&#039;m currently working, but that&#039;s where my mind is sitting right now.

So I&#039;ve been trying to blog about science as I pick things up, but I have this feeling that anything I write at the time being is stuff that&#039;s pretty elementary knowledge to the rest of the geoblogosphere. I again don&#039;t know if that&#039;s an on base thought to have, but it&#039;s there.

But despite any insecurities and uncertainties I have, I started blogging about it and intend to keep blogging about it because I enjoy doing so, and I enjoy reading what everyone else has to say. And, indeed, that gives me something to aspire to. I don&#039;t know what category I&#039;d be in right now, but I hope that in a few years, I can choose to blog-about-science or be-a-scientist-blogger on an entry to entry basis.

(Gah, didn&#039;t mean to write a whole essay in your comment box. Sorry!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honestly not sure which role I&#8217;d fit just yet.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I can rightfully call myself any sort of scientist right now, even if I&#8217;m taking classes and attending lectures and reading as much as I can find time to read (which isn&#8217;t much right now). At this particular point in time, I&#8217;m snorkling in the depths that are music comprehensive exams, prose thesis, and composition thesis, all of which feel like huge hurdles before I can hope to get down to more serious science &#8211; and I still haven&#8217;t received a letter saying either way about my admission to the geophysics program! I&#8217;m not sure whether I&#8217;m even on base in qualifying what I can call myself based on the degree on which I&#8217;m currently working, but that&#8217;s where my mind is sitting right now.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve been trying to blog about science as I pick things up, but I have this feeling that anything I write at the time being is stuff that&#8217;s pretty elementary knowledge to the rest of the geoblogosphere. I again don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s an on base thought to have, but it&#8217;s there.</p>
<p>But despite any insecurities and uncertainties I have, I started blogging about it and intend to keep blogging about it because I enjoy doing so, and I enjoy reading what everyone else has to say. And, indeed, that gives me something to aspire to. I don&#8217;t know what category I&#8217;d be in right now, but I hope that in a few years, I can choose to blog-about-science or be-a-scientist-blogger on an entry to entry basis.</p>
<p>(Gah, didn&#8217;t mean to write a whole essay in your comment box. Sorry!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

