<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sediment accumulation rates and bias: The Sadler effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/</link>
	<description>A blog about sedimentary geology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-7842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-7842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[can someone tell me the difference between fluxes and accumulation rate of sediments]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can someone tell me the difference between fluxes and accumulation rate of sediments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A million years worth of deposition: where and how much? &#171; Clastic Detritus</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-5006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A million years worth of deposition: where and how much? &#171; Clastic Detritus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-5006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the highest short-term rates known (several to 10s of meters per 1,000 years). But, if you remember this post, it is dangerous to extrapolate short-term rates to longer time intervals (and vice versa). When [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the highest short-term rates known (several to 10s of meters per 1,000 years). But, if you remember this post, it is dangerous to extrapolate short-term rates to longer time intervals (and vice versa). When [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highstand Fans paper - Comment and Reply &#171; Clastic Detritus</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Highstand Fans paper - Comment and Reply &#171; Clastic Detritus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ties in to a post I wrote about the Sadler (1981) paper (and a lot of subsequent confirmation) regarding comparing sediment accumulation rates from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ties in to a post I wrote about the Sadler (1981) paper (and a lot of subsequent confirmation) regarding comparing sediment accumulation rates from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tip Meckel</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tip Meckel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A similar phenomena occurs with sediment compaction rates.
Details published in Meckel et al., Geophysical Research Letters (2006); Meckel et al., Basin Research (2007), and Meckel, Quaternary Science Reviews (in press).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A similar phenomena occurs with sediment compaction rates.<br />
Details published in Meckel et al., Geophysical Research Letters (2006); Meckel et al., Basin Research (2007), and Meckel, Quaternary Science Reviews (in press).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianR</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Can anybody comment on the sedimentarion rates for clastic sediments and chemogenic sediments in Precambrian period.&quot;

Firstly, I can&#039;t say much off the top of my head regarding chemical sedimentation rates. Secondly, it very much depends on when in the Precambrian you are talking about. That is a very long time period and cannot be characterized by a &quot;representative&quot; sedimentation rate. Furthermore, then it depends on where...what kind of environment, etc.

But, to take a stab at your question...calculating any kind of rate requires a good chronology -- this is a big issue in the Precambrian.

Sorry, I wasn&#039;t much of a help :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can anybody comment on the sedimentarion rates for clastic sediments and chemogenic sediments in Precambrian period.&#8221;</p>
<p>Firstly, I can&#8217;t say much off the top of my head regarding chemical sedimentation rates. Secondly, it very much depends on when in the Precambrian you are talking about. That is a very long time period and cannot be characterized by a &#8220;representative&#8221; sedimentation rate. Furthermore, then it depends on where&#8230;what kind of environment, etc.</p>
<p>But, to take a stab at your question&#8230;calculating any kind of rate requires a good chronology &#8212; this is a big issue in the Precambrian.</p>
<p>Sorry, I wasn&#8217;t much of a help :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjan Ray</title>
		<link>http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranjan Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clasticdetritus.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/sediment-accumulation-rates-and-bias-the-sadler-effect/#comment-3054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not a professional sedimentologist. But I found the comments on sedimentation rate quite interesting. Can anybody comment on the sedimentarion rates for clastic sediments and chemogenic sediments in Precambrian period. I am a hydrogeologist and I need these comments for some specific purpose.
with thanks
Ranjan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a professional sedimentologist. But I found the comments on sedimentation rate quite interesting. Can anybody comment on the sedimentarion rates for clastic sediments and chemogenic sediments in Precambrian period. I am a hydrogeologist and I need these comments for some specific purpose.<br />
with thanks<br />
Ranjan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

